Validation of the SkinEthic HCE Time-to-Toxicity test method for eye hazard classification of chemicals according to UN GHS.

This study describes the within- and between-laboratory reproducibility (WLR and BLR) of a Time-to-Toxicity (TTT) approach for chemicals based on the SkinEthic™ HCE tissue construct, capable to distinguish chemicals that do not require classification for serious eye damage/eye irritation (No Cat.) from chemicals that require classification for eye irritation (Cat. 2), and serious eye damage (Cat. 1). The WLR and BLR was assessed with three participating laboratories. Each laboratory tested 40 coded chemicals in three independent runs. The predictive capacity of the method was assessed on a larger set of 150 chemicals (70 liquids and 80 solids) by combining the results of this study with the results of the test method developer. The WLR for the 20 liquids ranged from 85% to 95% with a BLR of 90%. For the 20 solids, a WLR and BLR of 100% was obtained. The test method developer obtained a WLR of 80% and 95%, based on 50 liquids and 48 solids tested in three independent runs, respectively. Regarding the predictive capacity, the SkinEthic™ HCE TTT test method identified 80.8% Cat. 1, 69.2% Cat. 2, and 74.9% No Cat. correctly. An independent peer review panel concluded that based on all available data, the relevance and reliability of the SkinEthic™ HCE TTT has been demonstrated for discriminating the three UN GHS eye hazard categories.

Ascorbic acid specifically reduces the misclassification of nonirritating reactive chemicals in the OptiSafe™ macromolecular eye irritation test.

Recently, we showed that the addition of physiological concentrations of ascorbic acid, a tear antioxidant, to the OptiSafe™ macromolecular eye irritation test reduced the false-positive (FP) rate for chemicals that had reactive chemistries, leading to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and molecular crosslinking. The purpose of the current study was to 1) increase the number of chemicals tested to comprehensibly determine whether the antioxidant-associated reduction in OD is specific to FP chemicals associated with ROS chemistries and 2) determine whether the addition of antioxidants interferes with the detection of true positive (TP) and true negative (TN) ocular irritants. We report that when ascorbic acid is added to the test reagents, retesting of FP chemicals with reactive chemistries show significantly reduced OD values (P < 0.05). Importantly, ascorbic acid had no significant effect on the OD values of TP or TN chemicals regardless of chemical reactivity. These findings suggest that supplementation of ascorbic acid in alternative ocular irritation tests may help improve the detection of TN for those commonly misclassified reactive chemicals.

Modeling the antioxidant properties of the eye reduces the false-positive rate of a nonanimal eye irritation test (OptiSafe).

We recently identified a group of chemicals that are misclassified by most, if not all, in vitro alternative ocular irritation tests, suggesting that nonanimal tests may not fully model the ocular environment in which these chemicals interact. To address this, we evaluated the composition of tears, the first defense against foreign substances, and identified the presence of antioxidants that could detoxify reactive chemicals that otherwise may be falsely identified as irritants in alternative irritation tests. In this study, we evaluated the effects of tear antioxidants on the ocular irritation scoring of commonly overclassified chemicals (false positives) using the OptiSafe™ ocular irritation test. Six tear-related antioxidants were individually added to the OptiSafe formulation, and the effects on test outcome were determined. Ascorbic acid, the most abundant water-soluble antioxidant in tears, specifically reduced the OptiSafe false-positive rate. Titration curves showed that this reduction occurs at in vivo concentrations and is specific to chemicals identified either as producing reactive oxygen species or as crosslinkers. Importantly, the addition of tear antioxidants did not impact the detection of true negatives, true positives, or other false positives unassociated with reactive oxygen species or crosslinking. These results suggest that the addition of tear antioxidants to in vitro alternative test systems may substantially reduce the false-positive rate and improve ocular irritant detection.

In silico prediction of the full United Nations Globally Harmonized System eye irritation categories of liquid chemicals by IATA-like bottom-up approach of random forest method.

As an alternative to in vivo Draize rabbit eye irritation test, this study aimed to construct an in silico model to predict the complete United Nations (UN) Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for classification and labeling of chemicals for eye irritation category [eye damage (Category 1), irritating to eye (Category 2) and nonirritating (No category)] of liquid chemicals with Integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA)-like two-stage random forest approach. Liquid chemicals (n = 219) with 34 physicochemical descriptors and quality in vivo data were collected with no missing values. Seven machine learning algorithms (Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, First Large Margin, Neural Net, Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Tree, and Support Vector Machine) were examined for the ternary categorization of eye irritation potential at a single run through 10-fold cross-validation. RF, which performed best, was further improved by applying the 'Bottom-up approach' concept of IATA, namely, separating No category first, and discriminating Category 1 from 2, thereafter. The best performing training dataset achieved an overall accuracy of 73% and the correct prediction for Category 1, 2, and No category was 80%, 50%, and 77%, respectively for the test dataset. This prediction model was further validated with an external dataset of 28 chemicals, for which an overall accuracy of 71% was achieved.

SkinEthic HCE Time-to-Toxicity on solids: A test method for distinguishing chemicals inducing serious eye damage, eye irritation and not requiring classification and labelling.

This study describes the development of a Time-to-Toxicity approach for solids (TTS) based on the SkinEthic™ HCE tissue construct, capable to distinguish chemicals that do not require classification for serious eye damage/eye irritation (No Cat.) from chemicals that require classification for eye irritation (Cat. 2), and serious eye damage (Cat. 1). Briefly, the time-to-toxicity of 69 solids was evaluated by exposing SkinEthic™ HCE tissue constructs to the test chemical for two different time periods (30-min, and 120-min). Based on the viability observed for the different exposure periods, a classification was assigned. The within laboratory reproducibility in terms of concordance in classifications (3 UN GHS categories), based on a set of 48 solids, was 93.7%. Furthermore, 73.6% Cat. 1 (N = 24), 55.6% Cat. 2 (N = 15) and 72.2% No Cat. (N = 30) were correctly identified with the SkinEthic™ HCE TTS test method. This study provides evidence that the SkinEthic™ HCE Time-to-Toxicity method (multiple exposure times) can distinguish Cat. 2 solids from Cat. 1 solids. This is an added value compared to the SkinEthic™ HCE EITS method (single exposure time) that can distinguish No Cat. chemicals from chemicals that do require classification and labelling for eye irritation/serious eye damage (Cat. 2/Cat. 1).

A microelectric cell sensing technique for in vitro assessment of ocular irritation.

The animal-based Draize test remains the gold standard for assessment of ocular irritation. However, subjective scoring methods, species differences, and animal welfare concerns have spurred development of alternative test methods. In this study, a novel in vitro method for assessing ocular irritancy was developed using a microelectric cell sensing technology, real-time cell analysis (RTCA). The cytotoxicity of sixteen compounds was assessed in two cell lines: ARPE-19 (human retina) and SIRC (rabbit cornea). In vitro inhibitory (IC50 and AUC50) values were determined at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h exposure, with a subset of values confirmed with MTT testing. The values displayed comparable predictivity of in vivo ocular irritation on the basis of a linear regression between the calculated values and each compounds' corresponding Draize-determined modified maximum average score (MMAS), but the ARPE-19 derived values were more strongly correlated than those from SIRC cells. Hence, IC50 values derived from ARPE-19 cells were used to predict the UN GHS/EU CLP classification of each test compound. The method was determined to have sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 50%, and overall concordance of 75%. Thus, RTCA testing may be best incorporated into a top-down tiered testing strategy for identification of ocular irritants in vitro.

A proposal for a new in vitro method for direct classification of eye irritants by cytotoxicity test - Preliminary study.

None of the in vitro method are suitable for directly classifying of a substance as an eye irritant (category 2). They can classify substance as category 1 (serious eye damage) or as "no category" (not requiring classification). The aim of this study was to develop a new method for direct classification of a substance as category 2. Cytotoxicity Assay to Assess Eye Irritation (CEI) was performed on fibroblast - HDFn cell line with 36 substances. 5 concentrations of all substances and neat substances were applied directly to the cells. After 30 min, medium was added and cells were incubated at 37 °C. The next day, the cytotoxicity assay was performed (MTT assay in the first run and NRU assay in the second run). Based on viability and IC50 value (concentration with 50 % viability) a substance could be classified in category 2, category 1, and as "no category". The results obtained were referred to ECHA database. This new method had high sensitivity (53.8-88.9 %), specificity (73.9-100.0 %) and accuracy (69.4-88.9 %) in the classification to all categories. It effectively classifies not only substances in category 2 but also in category 1 and substances that do not require classification.

Development of the SkinEthic HCE Time-to-Toxicity test method for identifying liquid chemicals not requiring classification and labelling and liquids inducing serious eye damage and eye irritation.

This study describes the development of a Time-to-Toxicity approach for liquids (TTL) based on the SkinEthic™ HCE tissue construct, capable to distinguish chemicals that do not require classification for serious eye damage/eye irritation (No Cat.) from chemicals that require classification for eye irritation (Cat. 2), and serious eye damage (Cat. 1). Briefly, the Time-to-Toxicity of 56 liquids was evaluated by exposing SkinEthic™ HCE tissue constructs to the test chemical for three different time periods (5-min, 16-min, and 120-min). Based on the viability observed for the different exposure periods, a classification was assigned. The within laboratory reproducibility in terms of concordance in classifications (3 UN GHS categories), based on a set of 50 liquids, was 80.0%. Furthermore, 84.3% Cat. 1 (N = 17), 79.4% Cat. 2 (N = 21) and 72.2% No Cat. (N = 18) were correctly identified with the SkinEthic™ HCE TTL test method. This study provides evidence that the SkinEthic™ HCE Time-to-Toxicity method (multiple exposure times) is capable of distinguishing Cat. 2 liquids from Cat. 1 liquids. This is an advantage compared to the SkinEthic™ HCE EITL method (single exposure time) that can distinguish No Cat. chemicals from chemicals that do require classification and labelling for eye irritation/serious eye damage (Cat. 2/Cat. 1).

A ready-to-use integrated in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing strategy using EpiSkin™ model in China.

The need of in vitro alternative methods has been increasing in toxicology research as well as in cosmetic industry in China recently. Following the establishment of China EpiSkin™ skin corrosion and irritation testing methods, both as stand-alone in vitro tests according to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) TG 431 and TG 439, the present study aims to evaluate the use of these two methods within the Integrated Approach on Testing and Assessment (IATA). The IATA, adopted by OECD as Guidance Document 203, provides guidance on the integration of existing and new data in a modular approach for classification and labelling of chemicals according to Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS) issued by the United Nations (UN). By applying bottom-up and top-down integrated testing strategies to a set of 60 chemicals representing various chemicals classes (organic acid/base/neutral, inorganic acid/base/salt, and surfactant) and physical states (liquid and solid), the results demonstrated that both strategies reached a high overall accuracy of 83.3% to distinguish non-classified, Category 2, Category 1B/1C and Category 1A according to UN GHS, identically. In conclusion, the integration of China EpiSkin™ skin corrosion and irritation testing data into either bottom-up or top-down strategy allows accurate assessment of potential skin hazard of chemicals. It brings a future extension of application of alternative methods and implementation of alternative testing strategies in China.

Chemical-Biological Terrorism and Its Impact on Children.

Children are potential victims of chemical or biological terrorism. In recent years, children have been victims of terrorist acts such as the chemical attacks (2017-2018) in Syria. Consequently, it is necessary to prepare for and respond to the needs of children after a chemical or biological attack. A broad range of public health initiatives have occurred since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. However, in many cases, these initiatives have not ensured the protection of children. Since 2001, public health preparedness has broadened to an all-hazards approach, in which response plans for terrorism are blended with those for unintentional disasters or outbreaks (eg, natural events such as earthquakes or pandemic influenza or man-made catastrophes such as a hazardous-materials spill). In response to new principles and programs that have evolved over the last decade, this technical report supports the accompanying update of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2006 policy statement "Chemical-Biological Terrorism and its Impact on Children." The roles of the pediatrician and public health agencies continue to evolve, and only their coordinated readiness and response efforts will ensure that the medical and mental health needs of children will be met successfully. In this document, we will address chemical and biological incidents. Radiation disasters are addressed separately.

Dermo-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro evaluation of skin irritation and corrosion.

In recent years, in-vitro skin models for chemical hazard identification have been developed. Most of them consist only of human keratinocytes, neglecting the contribution of other skin constituents. Cultures containing the dermal and epidermal component provide an attractive system to investigate, in a more realistic model, toxicological responses, which represents a distinct advantage over keratinocytes-based models that do not mimic faithfully the in vivo environment. This study aimed to validate dermo-epidermal organotypic cultures (ORGs) as a platform to perform irritation and corrosion tests. Skin models were constructed by seeding keratinocytes on fibroblast-containing fibrin gels. After 21 days, the ORGs were evaluated histologically, and the irritant and corrosion potential was determined by means of viability measurements (MTT assay) and cytokine release, according to 431 and 439 OECD tests guidelines. Skin models showed similar histological characteristics to native skin and were able to classify different substances with high accuracy, showing their applicability to skin irritation and corrosion tests. Although cytokines release seems to be chemical-dependent, a tendency was observed, leading to the improvement of the prediction capacity. Nevertheless, further studies should be done to reduce variability in order to increase prediction capacity.

Skin sensitizing effects of sulfur mustard and other alkylating agents in accordance to OECD guidelines.

Vesicants cause a multitude of cutaneous reactions like erythema, blisters and ulcerations. After exposure to sulfur mustard (SM) and related compounds, patients present dermal symptoms typically known for chemicals categorized as skin sensitizer (e.g. hypersensitivity and flare-up phenomena). However, although some case reports led to the assumption that SM and other alkylating compounds represent sensitizers, a comprehensive investigation of SM-triggered immunological responses has not been conducted so far. Based on a well-structured system of in chemico and in vitro test methods, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) established procedures to categorize agents on their skin sensitizing abilities. In this study, the skin sensitizing potential of SM and three related alkylating agents (AAs) was assessed following the OECD test guidelines. Besides SM, investigated AAs were chlorambucil (CHL), nitrogen mustard (HN3) and 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES). The methods are described in detail in the EURL ECVAM DataBase service on ALternative Methods to animal experimentation (DB-ALM). In accordance to OECD recommendations, skin sensitization is a pathophysiological process starting with a molecular initiating step and ending with the in vivo outcome of an allergic contact dermatitis. This concept is called adverse outcome pathway (AOP). An AOP links an adverse outcome to various key events which can be assayed by established in chemico and in vitro test methods. Positive outcome in two out of three key events indicates that the chemical can be categorized as a skin sensitizer. In this study, key event 1 "haptenation" (covalent modification of epidermal proteins), key event 2 "activation of epidermal keratinocytes" and key event 3 "activation of dendritic cells" were investigated. Covalent modification of epidermal proteins measured by using the DPRA-assay provided distinct positive results for all tested substances. Same outcome was seen in the KeratinoSens assay, investigating the activation of epidermal keratinocytes. The h-CLAT assay performed to determine the activation of dendritic cells provided positive results for SM and CEES but not for CHL and HN3. Altogether, following OECD requirements, our results suggest the classification of all investigated substances as skin sensitizers. Finally, a tentative AOP for SM-induced skin sensitization is suggested.

An in vitro depth of injury prediction model for a histopathologic classification of EPA and GHS eye irritants.

The purpose of this study was to develop Globally Harmonized System (GHS) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prediction models for classifying irritant materials based on histopathologic in vitro depth of injury (DoI) measurements. Sixteen different materials were selected, representing all classes of toxicity, according to the GHS and EPA classification systems. Food-source rabbit eyes, similar to eyes used for the widely accepted Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability and Isolated Chicken Eye ocular irritation tests, were used. Tissues were exposed to test material for 1 min, and corneas were collected at 3- and 24-hours post-exposure. Tissues were then fixed and processed for live/dead biomarker fluorescent staining using phalloidin. DoI was then measured, and the percent DoI values for the epithelium and stroma were compared to the EPA and GHS classifications. Excluding surfactants, EPA nonclassified (category IV) materials showed no stromal and very slight epithelial damage (≤10%) to the cornea, whereas EPA corrosive (category I) materials showed significantly greater damage (P < 0.001), ranging from 39% to 100% of the stromal depth. Importantly, EPA reversible (categories II and III) materials showed significant damage to the epithelium (>10%, P < 0.005) but significantly less severe damage to the corneal stroma (P < 0.001), ranging from 1% to 38% of the stromal depth. GHS nonclassified (category NC) irritants caused damage to the epithelium but not to the stroma. All GHS class 2 materials showed damage to the stroma (1-11%), whereas GHS corrosives caused significantly greater damage to the stroma (38-100%; P < 0.001). Additionally, one corrosive material, which produced a stromal DoI of 99% at 24 h, produced no apparent damage at 3-hours post-exposure. Based on these findings, histopathologic EPA and GHS prediction models are proposed that appear to separate and identify reversible irritants from other irritant classes. Furthermore, GHS classification appears to require stromal damage, whereas NC materials may or may not damage the corneal epithelium.

Differences in classification for skin corrosion/irritation in EU and Ukraine: Case study of alternative (in vitro and in silico) methods application for classification of pesticide active ingredient imazamox.

In Ukraine Globally Harmonized System of classification of chemicals has not been implemented yet. In this article we analyze differences between GHS/CLP classification systems and Hygienic Classification of Pesticides by the Degree of Hazard currently in force in Ukraine in respect of approach and criteria for classification of effects on skin. As a case study, we conducted in silico modelling of herbicide imazamox using skin irritation/corrosion modules of ToxTree. The prediction of ToxTree was "Not Corrosive to skin". Then skin irritation and skin corrosion in vitro tests (OECD TGs 439, 431) were conducted. Classification of this substance based on in vitro and in vivo results according to GHS/CLP was the same, while it was not possible based on in vitro results to assign certain hazard class of Ukrainian classification due to difference in its and GHS/CLP criteria. However, ongoing process of harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with EU will give opportunity not only use alternative methods, but also adopt most recent advances and incorporate data from non-animal methods directly into classification criteria.

A comparative assessment of the CLP calculation method and in vivo testing for the classification of plant protection products.

In Europe, animal testing for the purpose of regulatory plant protection product (PPP) assessment should be undertaken only as a last resort. Nevertheless, there is a need to improve the acceptance of alternative methods, which has been slow due to a lack of data regarding the predictivity of in vivo effects. The CLP calculation method is an alternative method based on the concentration addition of all adverse substances in a mixture. It is often applied as a conservative approach for the estimation of toxicodynamic interactions. However, PPPs consist of pesticides and co-formulants, which in combination can also exhibit altered toxicokinetic properties. Our analysis revealed that oral and inhalation toxicity was underestimated for approximately 45% of the in vivo classified products by the CLP calculation method as compared to in vivo testing. With regard to skin and eye irritation, the CLP calculation method underestimated the irritating potential in 22% and 6% of PPPs, respectively. Based on specific concentration limits, skin sensitisation was underestimated in 34% of PPPs. Similar false negative rates have been reported for PPP in vitro testing. Hence, we suggest the development of an integrated assessment strategy, weighing all available information and considering relevant parameters influencing predictivity and uncertainty.

Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.

INTRODUCTION: Irritation reactions are a frequently reported occupational illness. The potential adverse effects of pharmaceutical compounds (PCs) on eye and skin can now be assessed using validated in vitro methods. OBJECTIVES: Our overall aim is to reduce animal testing by replacing the historically utilized in vivo test methods with validated in vitro test methods which accurately determine the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of PCs to inform worker safety within the pharmaceutical space. Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS) have therefore conceptualized and internally qualified a tiered in vitro testing strategy to inform occupational hazards regarding eye and skin irritation and corrosivity of PCs. For the small scale pre-qualification phase, we paired historical in vivo and newly generated in vitro data for 15 PCs to determine the predictive capacity of in vitro assays already validated for the eye and skin irritation/corrosion endpoints and accepted for certain regulatory submissions. During the post-qualification phase, a group of 24 PCs were subjected exclusively to the developed tiered testing strategy, which is based on three Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in vitro methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The qualified in vitro testing strategy utilizes the Corrositex® assay for the corrosivity (OECD TG 435), the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay for ocular irritation (OECD TG 437), and the EpiDerm™ tissue model-based Skin Irritation Test (SIT) for dermal irritation (OECD TG 439). In the first step, the pH of each PC was determined. For compounds with pH extremes ≥11 or ≤2, the Corrositex® assay was generally conducted first. For compound(s) that were incompatible with or were negative in the Corrositex® assay or had pH values between 2 and 11, the BCOP assay and SIT were performed first. RESULTS: The results of the tiered testing strategy's qualification phase demonstrated that the BCOP assay is sensitive enough to identify a wide range of eye irritation/corrosion potentials and its over-prediction rate was considered acceptable to inform occupational hazards and ensure the proper handling practices of PCs. The SIT correctly predicted the skin irritation potential of 14 out of the 15 PCs included in the qualification phase, only over-predicting one PC. In the post-qualification phase, four PCs out of four tested were predicted corrosive by the Corrositex® assay and thus no further testing was needed or conducted. The rest of the PCs were evaluated in the BCOP assay (both neat and as a 20% dilution), with the higher response being used for hazard classification. Four PCs were determined to be severe eye irritants, 1 a moderate irritant, 8 were mild irritants, and 8 were non-irritants. The same set of PCs was evaluated using the SIT and were classified as non-irritants to skin. These results are consistent with the BMS historical in vivo results showing a very low number of PCs as skin irritants. CONCLUSIONS: This tiered in vitro testing strategy, which replaces the use of animal studies, was found to be reasonably accurate in its predictive capacity when compared to historical in vivo results and represents a conservative and reliable platform that can be utilized for the prediction of ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of PCs and for subsequent GHS classification and worker safety hazard communications.

IRRITANT AND ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS - SKIN LESION CHARACTERISTICS.

- Contact skin lesions may be the consequences of contact with various irritants or allergens, or due to other factors (e.g., UV radiation, microbials), intrinsic factors (e.g., in autoimmune responses), or even their combination. There are many substances related to irritant contact dermatitis (CD), causing irritant or toxic effects, e.g., chemical and physical agents, plants, phototoxic agents, airborne irritants, etc. Impaired barrier function (e.g., aberrancies in epidermal pH buffering capabilities) also participates by promoting bacterial biofilms and creating an environment favoring sensitization. Development of allergic CD skin lesions includes complex immune pathways and inflammatory mediators, influenced by both genetic (predominantly filaggrin mutations) and environmental triggers. In the pathogenesis of allergic CD, antimicrobial peptides play a prominent role; they are produced by various skin cells (e.g., keratinocytes, sebocytes) and move to inflamed lesions during an inflammation process. Also, in allergic CD skin lesions, the skin shows different types of immune responses to individual allergens, although clinical manifestations do not depend on the causative allergen type, e.g., nickel stimulates immune activation primarily of the Th1/Th17 and Th22 components. Also important are alarmins, proteases, immunoproteomes, lipids, natural moisturizing factors, tight junctions, smoking, etc. We expect that future perspectives may reveal new pathogenetic factors and scientific data important for the workup and treatment of patients with CD.

Eye irritation potential: palm-based methyl ester sulphonates.

AIM: To evaluate eye irritation potential of palm-based methyl ester sulphonates (MES) of different chain lengths; C12, C14, C16, C16:18. METHODS: The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test method (BCOP), OECD Test Guideline 437, was used as an initial step to study the inducing effect of palm-based MES on irreversible eye damage. The second assessment involved the use of reconstructed human corneal-like epithelium test method, OECD Test Guideline 492 using SkinEthic™ Human Corneal Epithelium to study the potential effect of palm-based MES on eye irritancy. The palm-based MES were prepared in 10% solution (w/v) in deionized water and tested as a liquid and surfactant test substances whereby both test conducted according to the liquid/surfactant treatment protocol. RESULTS: The preliminary BCOP results showed that palm-based MES; C12, C14, C16, C16:18 were not classified as severe eye irritants test substances with in vitro irritancy score between 3 and the threshold level of 55. The second evaluation using SkinEthic™ HCE model showed that palm-based MES; C12, C14, C16, C16:18 and three commercial samples were potentially irritants to the eyes with mean tissue viability ≤ 60% and classified as Category 2 according to United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals. However, there are some limitations of the proposed ocular irritation classification of palm-based MES due to insolubility of long chain MES in 10% solution (w/v) in deionized water. CONCLUSION: Therefore, future studies to clarify the eye irritation potential of the palm-based MES will be needed, and could include; methods to improve the test substance solubility, use of test protocol for solids, and/or inclusion of a benchmark anionic surfactant, such as sodium dodecyl sulphate within the study design.

CON4EI: Evaluation of QSAR models for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.

Assessment of ocular irritation is a regulatory requirement in safety evaluation of industrial and consumer products. Although a number of in vitro ocular irritation assays exist, none are capable of fully categorizing chemicals as stand-alone assays. Therefore, the CEFIC-LRI-AIMT6-VITO CON4EI (CONsortium for in vitro Eye Irritation testing strategy) project was developed to assess the reliability of eight in vitro test methods and computational models as well as establishing an optimal tiered-testing strategy. For three computational models (Toxtree, and Case Ultra EYE_DRAIZE and EYE_IRR) performance parameters were calculated. Coverage ranged from 15 to 58%. Coverage was 2 to 3.4 times higher for liquids than for solids. The lowest number of false positives (5%) was reached with EYE_IRR; this model however also gave a high number of false negatives (46%). The lowest number of false negatives (25%) was seen with Toxtree; for liquids Toxtree predicted the lowest number of false negatives (11%), for solids EYE_DRAIZE did (17%). It can be concluded that the training sets should be enlarged with high quality data. The tested models are not yet sufficiently powerful for stand-alone evaluations, but that they can surely become of value in an integrated weight-of-evidence approach in hazard assessment.

CON4EI: Short Time Exposure (STE) test method for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.

Assessment of ocular irritancy is an international regulatory requirement in the safety evaluation of industrial and consumer products. Although many in vitro ocular irritation assays exist, alone they are incapable of fully categorizing chemicals. Therefore, the CEFIC-LRI-AIMT6-VITO CON4EI consortium was developed to assess the reliability of eight in vitro test methods and establish an optimal tiered-testing strategy. One assay selected was the Short Time Exposure (STE) assay. This assay measures the viability of SIRC rabbit corneal cells after 5min exposure to 5% and 0.05% solutions of test material, and is capable of categorizing of Category 1 and No Category chemicals. The accuracy of the STE test method to identify Cat 1 chemicals was 61.3% with 23.7% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity. If non-soluble chemicals and unqualified results were excluded, the performance to identify Cat 1 chemicals remained similar (accuracy 62.2% with 22.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity). The accuracy of the STE test method to identify No Cat chemicals was 72.5% with 66.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Excluding highly volatile chemicals, non-surfactant solids and non-qualified results resulted in an important improvement of the performance of the STE test method (accuracy 96.2% with 81.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity). Furthermore, it seems that solids are more difficult to test in the STE, 71.4% of the solids resulted in unqualified results (solubility issues and/or high variation between independent runs) whereas for liquids 13.2% of the results were not qualified, supporting the restriction of the test method regarding the testing of solids.